Polyzen, Inc. v. Radiadyne, LLC

Filing 191

JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court DENIES RadiaDyne's supplemental motion [D.E. 98] for summary judgment concerning Polyzen' s patent-infringement action, DENIES Polyzen' s motion for summary judgment regard ing RadiaDyne' s claim of ownership [D.E. 92], and DISMISSES without prejudice Polyzen's patent-infringement action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Additionally, the court DISMISSES Polyzen's motion forsummary judgment [D.E. 89] regarding laches, waiver, and estoppel and DISMISSES Polyzen's motion for; summary judgment regarding RadiaDyne's defense of inventorship [D.E. 95]. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/26/2017. (Briggeman, N.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION

POL YZEN, INC.,
Plaintiff,
V.
RADIADYNE, LLC,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
CASE NO. 5:14-CV-323-D

Decision by Court.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the court DENIES RadiaDyne's
supplemental motion [D.E. 98] for summary judgment concerning Polyzen' s patent-infringement
action, DENIES Polyzen' s motion for summary judgment regarding RadiaDyne' s claim of
ownership [D.E. 92], and DISMISSES without prejudice Polyzen's patent-infringement action for
lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Additionally, the court DISMISSES Polyzen's motion for
summary judgment [D.E. 89] regarding laches, waiver, and estoppel and DISMISSES Polyzen's
motion for; summary judgment regarding RadiaDyne's defense ofinventorship [D.E. 95].

This Judgment Filed and Entered on May 26, 2017, and Copies To:
Jeffrey Lawrence Roether

(via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)

John Christopher Jackson

(via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)

Joseph Zito

(via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)

Daniel Blue

(via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)

Thomas Morrow

(via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)

DATE:
May 26, 2017

PETER A. MOORE, JR., CLERK
(By) /s/ Nicole Briggeman
Deputy Clerk