Bayer Cropscience LP v. Albemarle Corporation

Filing 43

ORDER GRANTING 42 Consent Motion to Seal Confidential Information of the Parties. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 5/14/2015. (Fisher, M.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Civil Action No. 5:14-cv-412-BO BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, Plaintiff(s), v. ORDER GRANTING CONSENT MOTION TO SEAL CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION ALBEMARLE CORPORATION, Defendant(s). This matter has come on for consideration on the Consent Motion to Seal Confidential Information of Albemarle Corporation ("Albemarle") and Bayer CropScience LP ("Bayer") [D.E. 42]. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 79.2 and Paragraph 12 of the Stipulated Protective Order [D.E. 26] entered by the Court in this case on December 15, 2014, and for good cause shown, the Court, having considered said motion, is of the opinion that the motion is well-taken and should be granted. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the following documents filed with the Court shall be and remain under seal until such time as the Court issues its order directing otherwise: 1. Bayer's Second Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, filed April 16, 2015 [D.E. 37]. 2. Declaration of Marina C. Carreker, filed April 16, 2015 [D.E. 37-3], including Exhibits A thru C thereto. 3. Bayer's Memorandum in Support of the Second Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, filed April 16, 2015 [D.E. 38]. 6964577vl 24058.00011 4. Albemarle's Response in Opposition to Bayer's Second Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, filed May 7, 2015 [D.E. 41]. 5. Declaration of David C. Kimball, filed May 7, 2015 [D.E. 41-1], including Exhibits A thru H thereto. 6964577vl 24058.00011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?