EICES Research, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility LLC
Filing
37
ORDER denying 11 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 12/1/14. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical information. (O'Brien, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DNISION
EICES RESEARCH, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE, INC.,
Defendant.
EICES RESEARCH, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 5:14-CV-489-D
)
)
)
)
)
No. 5:14-CV-490-D
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
EICES RESEARCH, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC.,
Defendant.
EICES RESEARCH, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
No. 5:14-CV-491-D
No. 5:14-CV-492-D
Plaintiff filed a motion for an order consolidating the three above-captioned related patent
infringement cases into cause number 5:14-CV-489-D, EICES Research. Inc. v. Apple. Inc., for all
pretrial purposes, including discovery and claim construction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a). Some
pretrial consolidation would appear to promote judicial economy and avoid unnecessary costs and
delay. The parties shall meet and confer concerning pretrial consolidation and seek to reach an
agreement. The parties shall describe any such agreement in their joint case management proposal.
Accordingly, the motion to consolidate is DENIED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED. This
_j_ day
of December 2014.
Chief United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?