Claytor v. Colvin
Filing
26
CONSENT ORDER granting 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the sum of $1,050.00 sent to Plaintiff's Counsel's office address in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 2/20/2015. (Marsh, K)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5:14-cv-499-BO
PAMELA CLAYTOR,
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
)
)
~
CAROLYNCOLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant
United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of
Social Security should pay the sum of$1,050.00 for attorney fees arising under the Equal Access
to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the
sum of $1,050.00 sent to Plaintiffs Counsel's office address in full satisfaction of any and all
claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is
dismissed with prejudice.
This ~day of£~-
•r15.
CONSENTED TO:
Is/CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar# 41290
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
charlotte@charleshallfirm.com
/s/LEO R. MONTENEGRO
Attorney for Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Room 655, Altmeyer Building
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21235
Telephone: (410) 965-3153
Fax: (410) 597-0527
Leo.R.Montenegro@ssa. gov
New York Bar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?