Elliott et al v. Johnson Lexus of Raleigh et al
Filing
10
JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the court has conducted a de novo review of the record, and finds Elliott's objections to be without merit, and the M&R to be correct and in accordance with the law. Accordingly, the court ado pts the M&R [DE-5] as its own, and ORDERS that Plaintiffs' § 1983 and§ 1985 claims are DISMISSED. The court further declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims, and ORDERS that those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Susan Edwards, Deputy for Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 11/24/2014. Copy sent to Sandra Elliott via US Mail, 52715-056, Alderson - FPC, Glen Ray Rd - Box A, Alderson, WV 24910. (Edwards, S.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
SANDRA ELLIOTT, et al.,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHNSON LEXUS OF RALEIGH, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
JUDGMENT
No. 5:14-CV-501-F
Decision by Court.
This action came before the Honorable James C. Fox, Senior United States District Judge, for ruling
as follows:
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the court has conducted a de novo review
of the record, and finds Elliott's objections to be without merit, and the M&R to be correct and in
accordance with the law. Accordingly, the court adopts the M&R [DE-5] as its own, and ORDERS
that Plaintiffs' § 1983 and§ 1985 claims are DISMISSED. The court further declines to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims, and ORDERS that those claims are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
This Judgment Filed and Entered on November 24, 2014, and Copies To:
Sandra Elliott (52715-056 Alderson-FPC, Glen Ray Rd. - Box A, Alderson, WV 24910)
DATE
November 24, 2014
JULIE A. RICHARDS, CLERK
/s/ Susan K. Edwards
(By) Susan K. Edwards, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?