Elliott et al v. Johnson Lexus of Raleigh et al

Filing 10

JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the court has conducted a de novo review of the record, and finds Elliott's objections to be without merit, and the M&R to be correct and in accordance with the law. Accordingly, the court ado pts the M&R [DE-5] as its own, and ORDERS that Plaintiffs' § 1983 and§ 1985 claims are DISMISSED. The court further declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims, and ORDERS that those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Susan Edwards, Deputy for Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 11/24/2014. Copy sent to Sandra Elliott via US Mail, 52715-056, Alderson - FPC, Glen Ray Rd - Box A, Alderson, WV 24910. (Edwards, S.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION SANDRA ELLIOTT, et al., Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON LEXUS OF RALEIGH, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT No. 5:14-CV-501-F Decision by Court. This action came before the Honorable James C. Fox, Senior United States District Judge, for ruling as follows: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the court has conducted a de novo review of the record, and finds Elliott's objections to be without merit, and the M&R to be correct and in accordance with the law. Accordingly, the court adopts the M&R [DE-5] as its own, and ORDERS that Plaintiffs' § 1983 and§ 1985 claims are DISMISSED. The court further declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims, and ORDERS that those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This Judgment Filed and Entered on November 24, 2014, and Copies To: Sandra Elliott (52715-056 Alderson-FPC, Glen Ray Rd. - Box A, Alderson, WV 24910) DATE November 24, 2014 JULIE A. RICHARDS, CLERK /s/ Susan K. Edwards (By) Susan K. Edwards, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?