Weaver Cooke Construction, LLC v. Curenton Concrete Works, Inc.

Filing 8

JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Weaver Cooke's motion for leave to appeal is DENIED. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 10/16/2014. Copy of judgment to US Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of North Carolina via US Mail at P.O. Box 791, Raleigh, NC 27602. (Marsh, K)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Weaver Cooke Construction, LLC, Movant, v. Stock Building Supply, LLC, Respondent. Weaver Cooke Construction, LLC, Movant, v. Curenton Concrete Works, Inc., Respondent. Weaver Cooke Construction, LLC, Movant, v. Waterproof Specialties, Inc., Respondent. Weaver Cooke Construction, LLC, Movant, v. Stock Building Supply, LLC, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 5:14-CV-475-BR 5:14-CV-515-BR 5:14-CV-524-BR 5:14-CV-537-BR Decision by Court. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Weaver Cooke’s motions for leave to appeal are DENIED. This judgment filed and entered on October 16, 2014, and served on: Joseph P. Gram (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) C. Hamilton Jarrett, III (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Douglas P. Jeremiah (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) A. Todd Brown (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Ryan George Rich (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Andrew A. Vanore, III (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Ron D. Medlin, Jr. (Via US Mail at Ennis Baynard Morton & Medlin, P.A., PO Drawer 1327, Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480.) A. Todd Brown (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) Ryan George Rich (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of North Carolina (via US Mail at P.O. Box 791, Raleigh, NC 27602) October 16, 2014 /s/ Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?