Durham v. Accelerated Financial So.

Filing 3

ORDER ADOPTING 2 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS as its own, and in the interests of justice, ORDERS that this action be transferred to the United States District Court of the Middle District of North Carolina, where venue is proper. This court has not conducted a frivolity review and has not reviewed Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. The United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina is better positioned to address those issues. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 11/14/2014. Order sent to Sondra Durham, 883 Lanier Farm Rd., Sanford, NC 27332 via US Mail on 11/14/2014. (Grady, B.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:14-CV-655-F SONDRA DURHAM, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ACCELERATED FINANCIAL SO., Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") [DE-3] ofUnited States Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr., recommending that this action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District ofNorth Carolina. Plaintiffs has failed to file any objection to the M&R. After an independent and thorough review of the Magistrate Judge's M&R [DE-3] and a review of the record, the court concludes that the M&R is correct and in accordance with the law. Accordingly, the court hereby ADOPTS the M&R [DE-3] as its own, and in the interests of justice, ORDERS that this action be transferred to the United States District Court ofthe Middle District of North Carolina, where venue is proper. This court has not conducted a frivolity review and has not reviewed Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis. The United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina is better positioned to address those issues. A SO ORDERED. This~ day ofNovember, 2014. J~OX Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?