Watson v. Colvin
Filing
36
CONSENT ORDER granting 35 Consent Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 2/18/2016. (Baker, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5: 14-cv-809-FL
CHERYL WATSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant
United States Attorney; and it appea1ing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of
Social Security should pay the sum of $5,500.00 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of
all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees arising under the
Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) for this action. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the
sum of $5,500.00, sent to Plaintiff's Counsel' s office address, in full satisfaction of any and all
claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is
dismissed with prejudice.
18th
February
This the _ _ _ day of _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 2016.
United States District Judge
CONSENTED TO:
ls/CHARLOTTE w_
HALL
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar # 41290
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
charlotte@charleshallfirm.com
ls/TODD LEWELLEN
Attorney for Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
6401 Social Security Boulevard
Altmeyer Bui Iding, Room 617
Baltimore, MD 21235
Telephone: (410) 965-3309
Fax: (410) 965-0417
Email: todd.lewellen@ssa.gov
CA Bar No. 243467
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?