GH Crescent Green Inc. v. KBS Crescent Green, LLC
Filing
20
ORDER DENYING: 13 Motion to Dismiss. In sum, the court DENIES defendant's motion to dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 4/20/2015. (O'Brien, C.)
----------~-
-----
---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DMSION
No. 5:14-CV-867-D
GH CRESCENT GREEN INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
KBS CRESCENT GREEN, LLC,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
On November 6, 2014, GH Crescent Green, Inc. ("GHCG" or "plaintiff'), filed a one-count
complaint in Wake County Superior Court, alleging that defendant, KBS Crescent Green, LLC
("KBS" or "defendant"), committed fraud in relation to a real estate transaction between the two
parties. See [D.E. 1-1] 5-9. On December 5, 2014, KBS timely removed the action to this court
pursuantto28U.S.C. ยงยง 1332and 1441 [D.E.l]. OnDecember31,2014,KBSmovedtodismiss
GHCG' s complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [D.E. 13] and
filed a supporting memorandum [D.E. 14]. On January 21, 2015, GHCG responded in opposition
[D.E. 16]. On February 5, 2015, KBS replied [D.E. 17].
After reviewing the complaint, the attached documents, the parties' memoranda, and the
governing legal standard, the court finds that plaintiff's complaint ekes across the line to plausibly
state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
See,~'
Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b), 12(b)(6); Ashcroft
v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009); Bell Atl. Cor;p. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007); Coleman
v. Md. Court of Appeals, 626 F.3d 187, 190 (4th Cir. 2010), aff'd, 132 S. Ct. 1327 (2012);
Giarratano v. Johnso!l, 521 F.3d 298, 302 (4th Cir. 2008). Whether plaintiff's fraud claim will
survive a motion for summary judgment is a question for another day.
In sum, the court DENIES defendant's motion to dismiss [D.E. 13].
SO ORDERED. This LQ day of Apri12015.
J
S C. DEVER Ill
Chifunited states District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?