GH Crescent Green Inc. v. KBS Crescent Green, LLC

Filing 20

ORDER DENYING: 13 Motion to Dismiss. In sum, the court DENIES defendant's motion to dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 4/20/2015. (O'Brien, C.)

Download PDF
----------~- ----- --- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DMSION No. 5:14-CV-867-D GH CRESCENT GREEN INC., Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ORDER ) KBS CRESCENT GREEN, LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) On November 6, 2014, GH Crescent Green, Inc. ("GHCG" or "plaintiff'), filed a one-count complaint in Wake County Superior Court, alleging that defendant, KBS Crescent Green, LLC ("KBS" or "defendant"), committed fraud in relation to a real estate transaction between the two parties. See [D.E. 1-1] 5-9. On December 5, 2014, KBS timely removed the action to this court pursuantto28U.S.C. ยงยง 1332and 1441 [D.E.l]. OnDecember31,2014,KBSmovedtodismiss GHCG' s complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [D.E. 13] and filed a supporting memorandum [D.E. 14]. On January 21, 2015, GHCG responded in opposition [D.E. 16]. On February 5, 2015, KBS replied [D.E. 17]. After reviewing the complaint, the attached documents, the parties' memoranda, and the governing legal standard, the court finds that plaintiff's complaint ekes across the line to plausibly state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See,~' Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b), 12(b)(6); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009); Bell Atl. Cor;p. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007); Coleman v. Md. Court of Appeals, 626 F.3d 187, 190 (4th Cir. 2010), aff'd, 132 S. Ct. 1327 (2012); Giarratano v. Johnso!l, 521 F.3d 298, 302 (4th Cir. 2008). Whether plaintiff's fraud claim will survive a motion for summary judgment is a question for another day. In sum, the court DENIES defendant's motion to dismiss [D.E. 13]. SO ORDERED. This LQ day of Apri12015. J S C. DEVER Ill Chifunited states District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?