Faust v. Colvin
Filing
22
CONSENT ORDER granting 21 Consent Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 04/09/2015. (Baker, C.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5:14-cv-894-FL
LORI FAUST,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant
United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Treasury Judgment
Fund should pay the sum of $400.00 in costs, in full and final settlement of all claims due against
the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees and costs arising under the Equal Access to
Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Treasury Judgment Fund pay to Plaintiff’s counsel the
sum of $400.00 and upon the delivery of such sum to Plaintiff’s counsel, this case is dismissed
with prejudice.
9th
April
This _____ day of ________________, 2015.
_________________________________
United States District Judge
CONSENTED TO:
/s/CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar # 41290
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
charlotte@charleshallfirm.com
/s/GABRIEL DEADWYLER
Attorney for Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of General Counsel
Room 635, Altmeyer Building
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Telephone: (410) 965-8775
Fax: (410) 597-0527
Email: Gabriel.deadwyler@ssa.gov
Penn. Bar. No. 205795
NJ Bar No. 028252007
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?