Elliott v. Malone et al

Filing 10

ORDER: The motion for reconsideration [D.E. 9] lacks merit and is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 2/26/2016. (Briggeman, N.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5:15-CV-184-D

SANDRA ELLIOTT,
Plaintiff,

v.
LEE LIN TART MALONE, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

On October 13, 2015, the court reviewed Elliott's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A
and dismissed plaintiff's complaint as frivolous [D .E. 7]. Elliott seeks reconsideration ofthe court's
dismissal of her complaint [D.E. 9].
The court has considered Elliott's motion for reconsideration under the governing standard.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e); Zinkand v. Brown, ~78 F.3d 634, 637 (4th Cir. 2007); Bogart v. Chapell,
396 F.3d 548, 555 (4th Cir. 2005); Dennis v. Colleton Med. Ctr.. Inc., 290 F.3d.639, 653 (4th Cir.
2002); Pac. Ins. Co. v. Am. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co., 148 F.3d 39«, 403 (4th Cir. 1998); Hughes v.
Bedsole, 48 F.3d 1376, 1382 (4th Cir. 1995). The motion for reconsideration [D.E. 9] lacks merit
and is DENIED.
SO ORDERED. This LC, day of February 2016.