Mitchell v. Colvin

Filing 35

CONSENT ORDER granting 34 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Senior Judge James C. Fox on 10/25/2016. (Grady, B.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION No. 5:15-cv-209-F LARRY D. MITCHELL, Plaintiff, ~ ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER ) CAROLYN COLVIN, ) Acting Commissioner of Social ) Security, ) ) Defendant. ) This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $3,319.25 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the sum of $3,319.25, sent to Plaintiffs Counsel's office address, in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice. This the ~ ) day of October, 2016. J6<es C. Fox Senior United States District Judge CONSENTED TO: BETHANY MORRIS HUKILL Attorney for Plaintiff N.C. Bar# 43081 Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C. P.O. Box 10629 Raleigh, NC 27605 Telephone: (919) 791-1883 Fax: (919) 791-1886 bethany@charleshallfirm.com GABRIEL R. DEADWYLER Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel Room 617, Altmeyer Building 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21235 Phone: (410) 965-8775 Fax: (410) 597-1435 Email: gabriel.deadwyler@ssa.gov Pennsylvania Bar ID No. 205795

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?