Charleswell v. Colvin
Filing
24
CONSENT ORDER granting 23 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 4/3/2017. (Edwards, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5:15-cv-515-FL
DARIEL CHARLESWELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through his attorney, has executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant
United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of
Social Security should pay the sum of $2,524.50 for attorney fees and the Treasury Justice Fund
should pay $400.00 in costs, in full and final settlement of all claims for attorney fees and costs
arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the
sum of $2,524.50 in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. §
2412(d), and reimbursement of the $400.00 filing fee from the Treasury Justice Fund delivered
to counsel’s office address, and upon the payment of such sums this case is dismissed with
prejudice.
This _____ day of ________________, 2017.
3rd
April
_______________________
U.S. District Court Judge Louise Wood Flanagan
CONSENTED TO:
/s/ Bethany Morris Hukill
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar # 43081
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
bethany@charleshallfirm.com
/s/ Wanda D. Mason, Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Office of Program Law
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard -Alt 614
Woodlawn, MD 21235
Work - 410-966-5044
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?