United States of America v. Ward and Brey Personal Property, et al

Filing 12

ORDER granting 11 Consent Motion to Stay Civil Forfeiture Proceeding - The Court GRANTS the Motion to Stay and stays these proceedings until such time as the related criminal proceedings have been finally determined. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 2/5/2016. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:15-CV-588 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. ORDER WARD AND BREY PERSONAL PROPERTY SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED Defendants. Pending before the Court is a Consent Motion to Stay [D.E. 11]. Claimant move pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2254 and § 981(g)(2) to stay this civil forfeiture proceeding. The Court GRANTS the Motion to Stay. The civil complaint was filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2254, which incorporates the procedures of 18 U.S.C. § 981. Section 981(g)(2) provides that upon the filing of a motion by a claimant, the Court shall stay a civil forfeiture proceeding where: (1) the claimant is the subject of a related criminal case or investigation; (2); the claimant has standing to assert a claim in the civil forfeiture proceeding; and (3) the continuation of the forfeiture proceeding would burden the right of the claimant against self-incrimination in the related criminal case. 18 U.S.C. § 981(g)(2). Upon a review of the record in this case, the Courts finds that a related criminal investigation is currently ongoing that involves similar facts, witnesses, and circumstances to this civil forfeiture proceeding. See 18 U.S.C. § 981(g)(4). Moreover, Claimants have standing to assert a claim in these forfeiture proceedings. Finally, a stay of these proceedings is warranted pursuant to Section 981(g) because civil discovery will burden Claimant’s right against self-incrimination in the related criminal investigation. See 18 U.S.C. § 981(g)(2). The Court, therefore, GRANTS the Motion to Stay and stays these proceedings until such time as the related criminal proceedings have been finally determined. SO ORDERED. This ____ day of _____________, 2016. 5th February LOUISE W. FLANAGAN U.S. District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?