United States of America v. Pruitt, et al

Filing 22

ORDER granting 21 Joint Motion to Dismiss Counts I & IV of the Complaint and Defendant Tressa J. Pruitt as a Party - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/17/2016. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO. 5:15-CV-623-FL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RANDALL V. PRUITT and TRESSA J. PRUITT ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF COUNTS I & IV OF THE COMPLAINT & DEFENDANT TRESSA J. PRUITT FROM THIS ACTION Defendants. This matter is being heard by the undersigned on the Joint Motion of Plaintiff and Defendant TRESSA J. PRUITT, to dismiss Count I of the Complaint (regarding 2004 tax liabilities) with prejudice, to dismiss Count IV of the Complaint (regarding the foreclosure on 4704 Tolley Court, Raleigh, North Carolina) with prejudice, and to dismiss Defendant TRESSA J. PRUITT as a party from this action with prejudice. It appearing that it is in the interest of justice to allow said Motion, as Counts I & IV of the Complaint, being all claims asserted against Defendant TRESSA J. PRUITT, have been wholly settled and satisfied, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Count I of the Complaint (regarding 2004 tax liabilities) is dismissed with prejudice, that Count IV of the Complaint (regarding the foreclosure on 4704 Tolley Court, Raleigh, North Carolina) is dismissed with prejudice, and that Defendant TRESSA J. PRUITT is dismissed as a party from this action with prejudice. All tax liabilities regarding the 2004 tax year are resolved and all parties are precluded from litigating the amount thereof, the payment thereof, or any other matter related thereto from this date forward; however, nothing herein shall preclude or hamper the Plaintiff from pursuing any and all remedies against Defendant Randall V. Pruitt upon all other claims in the Complaint. 17th This the _____ day of May, 2016. U.S. District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?