Velocitel, Inc. v. Hardy, et al
ORDER granting 67 Consent Motion. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/6/2017. (Collins, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CIVIL ACTION NO: 5:15-cv-624-FL
VELOCITEL, INC. d/b/a FDH
ORDER ENTERING STIPULATED
EXTENSION OF FACT DISCOVERY
DEADLINE AND DEADLINE FOR
THE PARTIES TO SERVE RESPONSES
CORBIN HARDY, WAVE INSPECTION )
TO OUTSTANDING DISCOVERY
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and SHANE
The Court Approves the below Stipulated Extension of Fact Discovery Deadline and
Deadline for the parties to Serve Responses to Outstanding Discovery made and entered into by
and between Plaintiff Velocitel, Inc. d/b/a FDH Velocitel (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Shane
Boone, Ph.D. (“Defendant”) by and through their respective counsel of record as follows:
The fact discovery period shall be extended an additional fifteen (15) days, to and
including September 30, 2017. No party will serve additional discovery requests or third party
subpoenas beyond those already served.
Plaintiff shall have until September 15, 2017 to respond to Defendant’s Second
Request for Production of Documents to Plaintiff Velocitel, Inc. d/b/a FDH Velocitel, Second
Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff Velocitel, Inc. d/b/a FDH Velocitel, and Third Request for
Production of Documents and Things to Plaintiff Velocitel, Inc. d/b/a FDH Velocitel, and
Defendant shall have until September 15, 2017 to respond to Plaintiff's Second Request for
Production of Documents.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant’s Second
Request for Production, Second Interrogatories, and Third Request for Production and Motion
to Extend Fact Discovery Period [DE #63] is resolved and is moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED this _______ day of September, 2017.
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
United States District Judge
15-cv-00624-FL Document 67-1 Filed 09/06/17 Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?