Ladner v. Colvin

Filing 24

ORDER denying 22 Motion to Remand to Social Security Administration. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 8/23/2016. (Romine, L.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:15-CV-631-BO MARK LADNER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner ofSocial Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This cause comes before the Court on plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings and defendant's motion for remand under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). DISCUSSION Plaintiff brought this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) for review of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner denying his claim for disability insurance benefits (DIB) pursuant to Title II of the Social Security Act. Defendant has moved to remand the matter to the Acting Commissioner because further fact-finding and analysis is required. Specifically, defendant argues that remand is necessary so that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) may properly evaluate the opinion of Dr. Smith, discuss whether plaintiffs impairments meet or equal a Listing of Impairments, and give further consideration to plaintiffs mental residual functional capacity. Plaintiff opposes defendant's motion, arguing that the decision of the Acting Commissioner may be properly reversed at this stage of the proceedings as the ALJ has already considered the medical opinion evidence, and that if the case is remanded it should be remanded with instructions to be assigned to a different ALJ for consideration. On review, defendant has not made a sufficient showing that remand over plaintiffs objection is appropriate at this time. The matter will thus proceed to oral argument before the undersigned at the Court's next social security term. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, defendant's motion for remand [DE 22] is DENIED. This matter will be set for hearing by separate notice. SO ORDERED, this _aJ_ day of August, 2016. T RRENCE W. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?