Melvin v. The United States of America et al

Filing 132

ORDER - Plaintiff's motion for extension is ALLOWED and plaintiff has until October 24, 2018, to file a memorandum in support of her motion for new trial or in the alternative to alter or amend judgment 125 . However, pl aintiff has not demonstrated a basis for protective order or for sanctions upon the record in this case. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for protective order or in the alternative for sanctions is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/3/2018. (A copy of this Order was sent via US mail to Pamela Melvin, 4949 Fieldcrest Drive, Fayetteville, NC 28303.) (Collins, S.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO. 5:16-CV-73-FL PAMELA MELVIN, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; TRACY NAYLOR also known as TRACY HAUKER; GINGER HUNSUCKER; KATHY REED; VENKATA G. BOODULURI; MASSEY HILL DRUG COMPANY, INC.; MASSEY HILL PHARMACY, LLC; and JONNA SQUIRES; Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter comes before the court on plaintiff’s motions (DE 126, 128) for extension of time to file memorandum in support of her motion for new trial or in the alternative to alter or amend judgment, as well as plaintiff’s motion for protective order or in the alternative for sanctions (DE 129). For good cause shown, plaintiff’s motion for extension is ALLOWED and plaintiff has until October 24, 2018, to file a memorandum in support of her motion for new trial or in the alternative to alter or amend judgment (DE 125). However, plaintiff has not demonstrated a basis for protective order or for sanctions upon the record in this case. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for protective order or in the alternative for sanctions is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this the 3rd day of October, 2018. _____________________________ LOUISE W. FLANAGAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?