Sahoo et al v. Gleaton et al
Filing
70
ORDER denying without prejudice 49 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 3/5/2018. Defendants may refile at the conclusion of the discovery period. (Stouch, L.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5:16-CV-153-BO
RACHEL SAHOO and GOURAB SAHOO,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JAMIE GLEATON and KITTY HART,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
This cause comes before the Court for the continued efficient administration of its docket.
Plaintiffs filed suit alleging civil rights claims against defendants on April 7, 2016. Defendants
filed their motion to dismiss plaintiffs' claims on May 8, 2017.
In that motion, defendants relied on matters outside the pleadings that are the subject of
significant disagreement by the parties. This Court therefore construed defendants' motion as a
motion for summary judgment, determining that it should be held open while the parties conduct
discovery.
The parties have since agreed to a discovery plan. Accordingly, this Court orders that
defendants' pending motion [DE 49] be denied without prejudice; defendants may refile at the
conclusion of the discovery period.
SO ORDERED, this
~day of March, 2018.
~¥BO~
TERRENCE W.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?