Sahoo et al v. Gleaton et al

Filing 70

ORDER denying without prejudice 49 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 3/5/2018. Defendants may refile at the conclusion of the discovery period. (Stouch, L.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:16-CV-153-BO RACHEL SAHOO and GOURAB SAHOO, Plaintiffs, v. JAMIE GLEATON and KITTY HART, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This cause comes before the Court for the continued efficient administration of its docket. Plaintiffs filed suit alleging civil rights claims against defendants on April 7, 2016. Defendants filed their motion to dismiss plaintiffs' claims on May 8, 2017. In that motion, defendants relied on matters outside the pleadings that are the subject of significant disagreement by the parties. This Court therefore construed defendants' motion as a motion for summary judgment, determining that it should be held open while the parties conduct discovery. The parties have since agreed to a discovery plan. Accordingly, this Court orders that defendants' pending motion [DE 49] be denied without prejudice; defendants may refile at the conclusion of the discovery period. SO ORDERED, this ~day of March, 2018. ~¥BO~ TERRENCE W. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?