Bankley v. TransEnterix, Inc. et al.
Filing
101
ORDER granting 95 Motion for Discovery. The Court's Order for Discovery Plan dated May 19, 2017 (Dkt. No. 94) is VACATED; and All discovery and other proceedings in this action, including the completion of a FRCP 26() conference, the submiss ion of a FRCP 26(f) discovery plan, and the submission ofRule 26(a) initial disclosures, are STAYED during the pendency of Defendants', motions to dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws (Dkt. Nos. 82, 84). Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 6/7/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5:16-cv-00313-D
THE TRANSENTERIX INVESTOR GROUP,
Individually and on Behalf of All Others
Similarly Situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
TRANSENTERIX, INC., TODD M. POPE,
JOSEPH P. SLATTERY, PAUL
LAVIOLETTE, ANDREA BIFFI, DENNIS J.
DOUGHERTY, JANE H. HSIAO, WILLIAM
N. KELLEY, AFTAB R. KHERANI, DAVID
MILNE, RICHARD C. PFENNIGER, JR.,
WILLIAM STARLING, and CANTOR
FITZGERALD & CO.,
Defendants.
----------------~~====~--
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY
PLAN
Before the Court is Defendants' Motion Regarding Discovery Plan (Dkt. No.
"Motion").
j£_j (the
The Court, having considered the parties' submissions in connections with the
Motion, and finding that good cause exists, hereby orders that:
1.
The Motion is GRANTED;
2.
The Court's Order for Discovery Plan dated May 19, 2017 (Dkt. No. 94) is
VACATED; and
3.
All discovery and other proceedings in this action, including the completion of a
FRCP 26(±) conference, the submission of a FRCP 26(±) discovery plan, and the submission of
Rule 26(a) initial disclosures, are STAYED during the pendency of Defendants' ,motions to
dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws (Dkt. Nos. 82,
84).
SO ORDERED. This
7
day of June 2017.
Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?