Rogers v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al

Filing 74

ORDER granting 73 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. Discovery deadline 7/17/17. Motions deadline 9/14/17. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for additional critical deadlines and information. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 6/29/2017. (Briggeman, N.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DNISION Civil Action No. 5:16-CV-00671-D ANDREWS. ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. ORDER KEFFER, INC., d/b/a KEFFER CHRYSLER JEEP. DODGE, a North SUNTRUST Carolina Corporation, BANK, a Georgia Corporation, JPMORGAN CHASE ยท BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION d/b/a CHASE, a Virginia Corporation, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, a Georgia Limited Liability Company, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., an Ohio Corporation, and TRANS UNION, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Defendants. TillS MATTER, coming before the Court upon the Consent Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order ("Motion") filed by Plaintiff ANDREW STUTFIELD ROGERS ("Plaintiff'); for good cause shown and upon the consent of Defendants KEFFER, INC. ("Defendant Keffer") and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ("Defendant Chase"), the Motion is hereby GRANTED . . - 1 and the Scheduling Order [D.E. 55] entered by the Court on February 3, 2017, as amended by the Order [D.E. 65] entered by on April 11, 2017, is modified as follows: L The deadline by which discovery shall be completed is extended for a period not less than fourteen (14) days, up to and including July 17, 2017 (as opposed to July 3, 2017); 2. EstablishingAugust 11, 2017, as the deadline by which the mediated settlement conference shall be completed in the above-captioned matter; and 3. The deadline by which all dispositive motions must be filed is extended for a period not less than thirty (30) days, up to and including September 14, 2017 (as opposed to August 14, 2017). SO ORDERED this, the _1j_ day of June, 2017. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?