Rogers v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
Filing
74
ORDER granting 73 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. Discovery deadline 7/17/17. Motions deadline 9/14/17. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for additional critical deadlines and information. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 6/29/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DNISION
Civil Action No. 5:16-CV-00671-D
ANDREWS. ROGERS,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
KEFFER,
INC.,
d/b/a
KEFFER
CHRYSLER JEEP. DODGE, a North
SUNTRUST
Carolina
Corporation,
BANK,
a
Georgia
Corporation,
JPMORGAN
CHASE
ยท BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION d/b/a
CHASE,
a
Virginia
Corporation,
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES,
LLC, a
Georgia Limited Liability
Company, EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC., an Ohio Corporation,
and TRANS UNION, LLC, a Delaware
Limited Liability Company,
Defendants.
TillS MATTER, coming before the Court upon the Consent Motion for Modification of
Scheduling Order ("Motion") filed by Plaintiff ANDREW STUTFIELD ROGERS ("Plaintiff');
for good cause shown and upon the consent of Defendants KEFFER, INC. ("Defendant Keffer")
and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ("Defendant Chase"), the Motion is hereby GRANTED
.
.
-
1
and the Scheduling Order [D.E. 55] entered by the Court on February 3, 2017, as amended by the
Order [D.E. 65] entered by on April 11, 2017, is modified as follows:
L
The deadline by which discovery shall be completed is extended for a period not
less than fourteen (14) days, up to and including July 17, 2017 (as opposed to July 3, 2017);
2.
EstablishingAugust 11, 2017, as the deadline by which the mediated settlement
conference shall be completed in the above-captioned matter; and
3.
The deadline by which all dispositive motions must be filed is extended for a
period not less than thirty (30) days, up to and including September 14, 2017 (as opposed to
August 14, 2017).
SO ORDERED this, the _1j_ day of June, 2017.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?