Rhodes v. Colvin
Filing
25
CONSENT ORDER granting 24 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/26/2017. (Edwards, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5: 16-cv-674-FL
CYNTHIA RHODES,
Plaintiff,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
NANCY BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the
parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant
United States Attorney; and it appea1ing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of
Social Security should pay the sum of $4,797.00 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of
all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees arising under the
Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the
sum of $4,797.00 in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. §
2412(d), delivered to counsel's office address, and upon the payment of such sum this case is
dismissed with prejudice.
This _ _ dayof _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 2017,
26th
June
U.S. District Court Judge Louise Flanagan
CONSENTED TO:
Isl CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Attorney for Plaintiff
N.C. Bar # 41290
Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C.
P.O. Box 10629
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone: (919) 791-1883
Fax: (919) 791-1886
charlotte@charleshallfinn.com
Isl DAYID MANSFIELD
Attorney for Defendant
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
Altmeyer Building, Room 617
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401
Telephone: (410) 966-2305
Fax: (410) 597-0527
David.mansfeild@ssa.gov
Virginia Bar: #80645
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?