Rhodes v. Colvin

Filing 25

CONSENT ORDER granting 24 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/26/2017. (Edwards, S.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5: 16-cv-674-FL CYNTHIA RHODES, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order agreed to by the parties and it appearing that Plaintiff, by and through her attorney, has executed this Consent Order and Defendant has executed this Consent Order, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney; and it appea1ing that the parties have agreed that the Commissioner of Social Security should pay the sum of $4,797.00 for attorney fees, in full and final settlement of all claims due against the Social Security Administration, for attorney fees arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff the sum of $4,797.00 in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), delivered to counsel's office address, and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice. This _ _ dayof _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 2017, 26th June U.S. District Court Judge Louise Flanagan CONSENTED TO: Isl CHARLOTTE W. HALL Attorney for Plaintiff N.C. Bar # 41290 Charles T. Hall Law Firm, P.C. P.O. Box 10629 Raleigh, NC 27605 Telephone: (919) 791-1883 Fax: (919) 791-1886 charlotte@charleshallfinn.com Isl DAYID MANSFIELD Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel Altmeyer Building, Room 617 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21235-6401 Telephone: (410) 966-2305 Fax: (410) 597-0527 David.mansfeild@ssa.gov Virginia Bar: #80645

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?