United States of America v. Fuller's Personal Property et al

Filing 43

ORDER of DEFAULT as to Certain Defendants granting 37 Motion for Entry of Default. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for additional information. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 10/3/2017. (Jenkins, C.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO. 5:16-CV-688-D UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FULLER'S PERSONAL PROPERTY, SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS: A RAVEN ARMS .25 CALIBER PISTOL, MODEL MP-25, SERIAL NUMBER: 1737745; et al. Defendants. DEFAULT AS TO CERTAIN DEFENDANTS Upon motion and proper showing by the attorney for the plaintiff, the United States of America, default is hereby entered against certain defendants for having failed to appear, plead, or otherwise defend as provided by Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Those certain defendants to which default is entered are described as follows: A RAVEN ARMS .25 CALIBER PISTOL, MODEL MP-25, SERIAL NUMBER: 1737745; A ROCK RIVER ARMS LAR-15, 5.56 RIFLE, SERIAL NUMBER: CM136498; A ROMARM CUGIR MODEL GP WASR 10/63, 7.62 RIFLE, SERIAL NUMBER: 1977HC3294; 1 A SAVAGE ARMS MODEL 93R17, .17 CALIBER RIFLE, SERIAL NUMBER: 1207102; A TAURUS MODEL 85, .38 SPECIAL PISTOL, SERIAL NUMBER: SD23863; A MARLIN MODEL 925M, .22 CALIBER RIFLE, SERIAL NUMBER: 91670097; A ROMARM/CUGIR MODEL ROMAK 991, 7.62 x 39 MM RIFLE, SERIAL NUMBER: 1-00503-99; A GLOCK 29, 10 MM PISTOL, SERIAL NUMBER: RUT663; BUSHNELL BANNER 3-9X40MM SCOPE; TWO (2) GENERIC SCOPES; AO VARMINT SCOPE; LIGHT AND LASER LITHIUM SCOPE; A RAVEN 25 CAL MP-25 HANDGUN, SERIAL NUMBER: 1737745; LEGION ARMS LIGHT LITHIUM SCOPE; CENTERPOINT SCOPE; TRU GLO SCOPE; VANGUARD SCOPE; REDFIELD SCOPE: ALL RELATED AMMUNITION AND MAGAZINES; BULLDOG HOLSTER; 2 "ยท SO ORDERED. This~ Oc~ day of September 2017. Chief United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?