United States of America v. $4,300.00 in U. S. Currency, et al

Filing 17

DEFAULT JUDGMENT against defendants - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 5/3/2017. (Briggeman, N.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO. 5:16-CV-837-FL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) $4,300.00 IN U. S. CURRENCY ) ) AND ) ) $22,368.29 IN U. S. CURRENCY, ) ) Defendants. ) DEFAULT JUDGMENT ________________________________________________________________ This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. It appearing that a copy of the Complaint herein was served upon the defendants, in accordance with Supplemental Rule G(4), and, thus, that due notice was given accordingly, the Court finds that: 1. Process was duly issued in this cause and the defendants were duly seized by the U. S. Marshal’s Service pursuant to said process; 1 2. No entitled persons have filed any claim to the defendants nor answer regarding them within the time fixed by law; and 3. The well-plead allegations of the Complaint in respect to the defendants are taken as admitted, as no one has appeared to deny the same, and default has been entered. [DE #12]. Based upon the above findings, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. Default judgment be and the same is hereby entered against the defendants; 2. All persons claiming any right, title, or interest in or to the said defendants are held in default; 3. The defendants are forfeited to the United States of America; 4. The U. S. Marshal’s Service is hereby directed to dispose of the defendants according to law; and 5. Upon the entry of this judgment, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. SO ORDERED this 3rd day of May, 2017. ____________________________ LOUISE W. FLANAGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?