Becker v. Harris & Hilton, P.A.

Filing 14

ORDER - The parties are therefore DIRECTED to file a stipulation of dismissal within 60 days of the date of entry of this order. In light of the notice of settlement, Motions 10 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 11 Motion for Extensi on of Time to File Response are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with permission to refile should the settlement not be consummated. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 12/28/2016. The parties are reminded to read the attached order in its entirety. (Downing, L.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN D.IVISION No: 5:16-CV-848-BO CICELY BECKER, Plaintiff, v. HARRIS & HILTON, P.A., Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER The Court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in -controversy among them. [DE 12]. The parties are therefore DIRECTED to file a stipulation of dismissal within sixty (60) days of the date of entry of this order, subject to the right of apy party to provide notice to the Court within that time that the settlement will not be consummated. Failure to comply with this order will result in this matter being diSIIiissed with prejudice at the close of the sixty day period. In light of the notice of settlement, plaintiff's motion for partial Judgment on the pleadings [DE 10] and defendant's motion for extension of time to respond [DE 11] are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with permission to refile should the settlement not be consummated. SO ORDERED, this -$!l_ day of December, 2016. TERRENCE W. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?