Berger, et al v. The United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al

Filing 7

ORDER granting 6 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 1/14/2017. (Baker, C.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-25-FL PHIL BERGER, and TIM MOORE, Plaintiffs, v. SYLVIA BURWELL, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ANDREW SLAVITT, THE CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, RENARD MURRAY, DEMPSEY BENTON, THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS PHIL BERGER AND TIM MOORE’S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Phil Berger and Tim Moore’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. After consideration, and good cause appearing: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is GRANTED. The Court hereby orders that: 1. The Federal Defendants are enjoined from formally approving the proposed State Plan Amendment or any similar State Plan Amendment that does not comply with the requirements of Section 1902(a)(1) and (a)(2) of the Social Security Act and is not submitted pursuant to a valid authorization by the State; and 2. The State Defendants are enjoined from submitting the proposed State Plan Amendment or any similar State plan amendment that does not comply with the 1 requirements of Section 1902(a)(1) and (a)(2) of the Social Security Act. This injunction shall be effective immediately, and it shall last for fourteen days or until the Court orders otherwise. DATED this _______ day of ________________, 20____. 14th January 17 _______________________ Louise Wood Flanagan United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?