Perez v. Dax Deals Inc., et al.

Filing 11

ORDER denying 7 Motion for Entry of Default. Defendants shall have up to and including November 20, 2017, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint [DE-1]. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 11/13/2017. (Briggeman, N.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:17-CV-34-BR R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ) DAX DEALS, INC., dba DAX DEALS, and DAVID YABOROUGH, an individual, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) On September 15, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Entry of Default [DE-7], seeking entry of default as to Defendants Dax Deals, Inc. d/b/a Dax Deals and David Yarborough. On October 9, 2017, Defendants filed a response [DE-8] in opposition to the motion for entry of default, stating < that Defendant Yarborough did not appreciate that a lawsuit had been filed against him or Defendant Dax Deals, and requesting an extension of time for Defendants' to file an answer. At the direction of the presiding judge, the motion for entry of default was referred to the undersigned for ruling. The motion [DE-7] is DENIED, and Defendants shall have up to and including November 20, 2017, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint [DE-1]. SO ORDERED. This the 13th day of November, 2017. p~~~ Clerk of Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?