Floyd v. Berryhill
Filing
30
CONSENT ORDER granting 29 Consent Motion for Attorney Fees under EAJA. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 3/8/2018. (Jenkins, C.)
IN THE UNITED' STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERNDTSTRICT.OFNORTilCAROLINA
· · · · ·
w~sTE.liN
DrvJsloN · · - · · · ·
No. 5'.I7~cv-40'-D
)
)
OLIVER FLOYD,
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
)
V.
CONSENT .ORDER·
NANCY BERRYHILL, '
.
.
~
,.
.
"
)
}
)
.)
)
This action beit1g subinitf¢<:f.to the C()uft for ent:ry ·.or'a:.consent Ord.et"agr~e~ tdJ)y the
.
.,
Actiiig. (::qlhrilissiorter 'Of Social
Security;
Order and Defendant has·'execu,te&this Consent Order, by and:through.th~- under~igne..d .Assjsfant
United Stares Attomey.; and itAlppeari~g:that the parties .ha:Ve1~
Equ_al Acces~. to Ju,stice Ac;t ('~EAJA':'). Sge 28 l).S~C. § :2,4 t2.(d).
It. als.o a_ppe_~dng,that-t4e..
TreasuryJudgment Fund("TJF'~) should reirriburse.Plaintiff's;counseLthe::$460:00 fifih!ffee,
· It. Hrtherefore ORDERED ~hat the Corruhissioh~r ofS:odat.S~c!J:rity'plfy, tP PI,aindtf'the_
su111 o( $5,0QO.QO at1d that th¢ TJF pay to Plaintiffs'
~oufi:s~I ~4()0;oo, bq~h
deliyer,eq to
Plaintiff's:counsel' s office. addre~s, in full. satisfaction oiim¥·a~d.all cl8.:ims ati~ingi.Jl!ld~r,EAJA,.
28 U.S;C. § 2411(d), and'uponthe: payment. of such :sums ·thiscasefis~dismissedwith J:l1i~judlce:
SO ORDERED. This
8 day of March 2018.
CONSENTED TO:
/s/CHARLOTTEW. HALL
Attorney for' Plaintiff
N.C. Bar#4l290
Chad~s. T.' Ha_ll Law Finn, f :c.
P~O. Box 1062_9
R:a1ei~h,,NC 27605
Telepi1one: (919) 79 i -1883:
Fax:(919) 791-1886
charlotte@charleshalltiiln.c'Qin
is/ AMANDA GILMAN
Attorney for Defendant
Special .As_sist~n~ lJtiite(j :Sta.t~s ~ftqpjey
Offic~ ofthe GeneralCb'-'ns_~l
Room 653, Altmeyer Building6401 Sectirity'Boulevard
Baltilriore~
MD 21235
Telephone: (410)965-9641
Fax_:(41 0)597 -0527
,_A.manda.gilman@ssa.gov
Maryland Bar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?