Morgan v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
Filing
63
ORDER granting 42 Motion to Seal Document 38 Appendix to the Statement of Facts, 33 PROPOSED SEALED Memorandum in Support, 31 PROPOSED SEALED Document, 35 Amended Document, 32 PROPOSED SEALED Document. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 4/13/2018. (Collins, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Northern Division
No. 5:17-CV-132-FL
GREGORY K. MORGAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY and affiliates,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER ON QUALITY EQUIPMENT,
LLC’S MOTION TO SEAL
This matter comes before the Court on third-party Quality Equipment, LLC’s (“Quality
Equipment”) Motion to Seal portions of Defendant’s Local Civil Rule 56.1 Statement of Material
Facts [DE 31] (“Defendant’s Statement”); Defendant’s Appendix to Local Civil Rule 56.1
Statement of Material Facts [DE 32] (“Defendant’s Appendix”); Defendant’s Brief in Support of
Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defendant’s Brief”) [DE 33 and DE 35]; and Plaintiff’s
Appendix of Exhibits to Local Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Facts [DE 38] (“Plaintiff’s
Appendix”).
WHEREAS, portions of Defendant’s Statement, Defendant’s Appendix, Defendant’s
Brief, and Plaintiff’s Appendix (collectively, the “Filings”) contain non-public commercial
information belonging to Quality Equipment, including (1) information regarding Quality
Equipment’s confidential business strategies or transactions; (2) confidential communications
with Quality Equipment’s most significant supplier; and (3) undisclosed financial information,
including Quality Equipment’s budget, distributions and specific compensation for its
employees; and
1
WHEREAS, the portions of the Filings at issue in the Motion to Seal have been
designated “Confidential” pursuant to the Consent Protective Order [DE 25] in this case; and
WHEREAS, it appears to the Court that Quality Equipment claims, in good faith, that
disclosure of the nonpublic commercial information contained in the Filings could cause harm to
Quality Equipment’s competitive position; and
WHEREAS, the parties to this action do not object to the filing under seal of the
information specified by Quality Equipment, and the Court is aware of no other party asserting
an objection; and
WHEREAS, it appears to the Court that the parties believe that consideration of the
information set forth in the Filings and at issue in the Motion to Seal is necessary for the parties
to present their arguments for their respective Motions for Summary Judgment [DE 27 and DE
36]; and
WHEREAS, the public’s right to access to such information is outweighed by the interest
that Quality Equipment claims in protecting against its public disclosure; and
WHEREAS, the Court has provided notice to the public of Quality Equipment’s Motion
to Seal; and
WHEREAS, it appears that less restrictive alternatives to sealing would not be practical
or adequate to preserve the confidentiality of the information in question;
NOW, THEREFORE, upon consideration of Quality Equipment’s Motion to Seal, the
memorandum in support thereof, and the entire record herein, it is hereby
ORDERED that Quality Equipment’s Motion to Seal is hereby GRANTED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the following portions of Defendant’s Statement,
Defendant’s Appendix, Defendant’s Brief, and Plaintiff’s Appendix be FILED UNDER SEAL:
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Paragraphs 52 and 53 of Defendant’s Statement;
Defendant’s Appendix pp. 110-111 (Morgan Dep. 161:20-162:6, 162:17-162:23);
Defendant’s Appendix p. 112 (Morgan Dep. 163:20-163:23-25);
Defendant’s Appendix p. 113 (Morgan Dep. 165:8 and 165:21) (only the specific
percentage amount and dollar amounts);
Defendant’s Appendix p. 172 (Bowers Dep. 65:7-65:25);
Defendant’s Appendix p. 173 (Bowers Dep. 68:24-68:25);
Defendant’s Appendix p. 174 (Bowers Dep. 70:3-70:10);
Defendant’s Appendix pp. 178-181 (Bowers Dep. Ex. 3).
The following lines (or portions thereof) in Defendant’s Brief:
o Page 11 – lines 21-22 (last sentence of page);
o Page 12 – lines 1-3 (first sentence of page);
o Page 23 – lines 11-12 (subsection (2) of the last sentence of the first full
paragraph);
o Page 24 – lines 3-7;
o Page 28 – line 5; and
Ex. 2 of Plaintiff’s Appendix (Morgan Aff. ¶¶ 5, 8, and 9).
SO ORDERED, this the 13th day of April, 2018.
__________________________________
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
United States District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?