Lusterman v. Berryhill
Filing
20
JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205( g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and upon consideration of the Commissioner's unopposed request to remand this cause for further administrative proceedings, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner'sdecision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and remands the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings with respect to Plaintiffs claim of disability. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 9/29/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
ANGELIKA RENEE LUSTERMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
CASE NO. 5:17-CV-138-D
Decision by Court.
This action came before this Court for ruling as follows.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to the power of this Court to
enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in
Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. § 405(g), and upon consideration of the Commissioner's unopposed request to remand
this cause for further administrative proceedings, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's
decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and remands the case to the Commissioner
for further administrative proceedings with respect to Plaintiff’s claim of disability.
This Judgment Filed and Entered on September 29, 2017, and Copies To:
Maria Mayo
(via CM/ECF electronic notification)
Elisa Donohoe
(via CM/ECF electronic notification)
DATE:
September 29, 2017
PETER A. MOORE, JR., CLERK
(By) /s/ Nicole Briggeman
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?