Progress Solar Solutions, LLC v. Fire Protection, Inc. et al
ORDER granting 145 Motion to File 15-Page Brief. Sent to Mikel Bills at 11737 Belmont Place Chino, CA 91710 and Michael D Long at 3948 Legacy Drive Suite 106-155 Plano, TX 75023 via US Mail. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 5/20/2020. (Sellers, N.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-CV-152-D
PROGRESS SOLAR SOLUTIONS, LLC,
FIRE PROTECTION, INC. dba FPI
ENVIRONMENTAL; JOHN DOE, AS
EXECUTOR OR ADMINISTRATOR
FOR THE ESTATE OF NORMAN
STEPHEN VAN VALKENBURGH, AND
JEFFREY VAN VALKENBURGH, AS
TRUSTEE FOR THE NORMAN
STEPHEN VAN VALKENBURGH
IRREVOCABLE LIVING TRUST;
MIKEL BILLS; MICHAEL D. LONG;
and SOLAR MOD SYSTEMS, INC.,
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO
FILE 15-PAGE BRIEF IN SUPPORT
OF MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
This case comes before the Court on motion (D.E. 145) filed by Plaintiff Progress Solar
Solutions, LLC ("Plaintiff'), for leave to file a proposed brief of more than ten pages in length in
support of its motion for sanctions (D .E. 144) against defendant Mikel Bills or, in the event that
leave is not granted, for an extension of time to file a shorter, supporting memoranda.
The Court finds that good cause has been shown, and exercises its discretion pursuant to
Local Civil Rule 1.1, E.D.N.C, to allow Plaintiffs motion for leave to file that brief that is attached
to Plaintiff's underlying motion. The Court need not decide Plaintiff's alternative motion for an
extension of time as that request is now moot. Plaintiff's proposed brief (D.E. 144-1) shall be
considered part of the record on its motion for sanctions.
Case 5:17-cv-00152-D Document 147 Filed 05/20/20 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED, this the ___1Q_ day of May, 2020.
JAMES C. DEVER III
United States District Judge
Case 5:17-cv-00152-D Document 147 Filed 05/20/20 Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?