Witham v. DEC New York State et al

Filing 23

ORDER denying 22 Motion to Recuse and Change Venue. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 8/30/2018. Copy sent to Judson Witham at 15215 Aiken Wake Forest, NC 27587 via US Mail. (Sellers, N.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:17-CV-171-BO JUDSON WITHAM, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This cause comes before the Court on plaintiffs pro se motion to recuse and change venue [DE 22]. This motion follows this Court's previous order dismissing his case [DE 6] and denying his motion to vacate [DE 21]. Plaintiff, proceedingpro se, originally filed his complaint on April 10, 2017. [DE 1]. This Court dismissed his case on May 31, 2017, finding that he had failed to satisfy the minimum notice standard articulated in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), and that the Court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendants. [DE 6]. Plaintiffs appeal was dismissed by the Fourth Circuit [DE 16] and the Supreme Court denied his petition for writ of certiorari [DE 19]. Plaintiffs motion to vacate the dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) was denied by this Court on August 17, 2018. [DE 21]. Plaintiff has now filed the instant motion, titled "Motion to Recuse and Change of Venue Continuing Fraud Upon The Court Demand For En Banc Reconsideration." [DE 22]. Plaintiffs case is closed. His case was dismissed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed that dismissal, and the Supreme Court declined to hear his appeal. His previous motion for relief from the final judgment was denied. There is nothing left to say. Plaintiffs motion [DE 22] is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this~ day of August, 2018. ~ll.of1TRRENCEW:B0YLE UNITED STATES DISTRIC:: JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?