Lopez et al v. Ham Farms, LLC et al
Filing
98
ORDER granting 97 Motion to Stay. All deadlines in this action are STAYED as between Plaintiffs and Defendant Martinez (including but not limited to Defendant Martinez's deadline to file an answer to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint) pending the Court's ruling on the parties' Joint Motion for Final Approval of the Settlement Agreement among the Parties. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 1/25/2019. (Sellers, N.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
ADAN LOPEZ, FRANCISCO MENDEZ,
EZEQUIEL ABURTO-HERNANDEZ,
ELENA RAFAEL-PERALTA, JOSE PABLO
SANDOVAL-MONTALVO, JOSE
JIMENEZ-OLIVAREZ, ALEJANDRO
MARTINEZ-MENDEZ, FRANCISCO
PALACIOS-HERNANDEZ, HUMBERTO
DE LA LUZ ARMENTA, and ISAIAS
ESPINOSA-VAZQUEZ, on behalf of
themselves and other similarly situated
persons,
Plaintiffs,
COLLECTIVE ACTION
CLASS ACTION
Civil Action No.: 5:17-CV-329-D
v.
HAM FARMS, LLC f/k/a HAM FARMS,
INC., HAM PRODUCE, LLC f/k/a HAM
PRODUCE COMPANY, INC., ISMAEL
PACHECO, PACHECO CONTRACTORS,
INC., HUGO MARTINEZ, GUTIERREZ
HARVESTING, LLC, ROBERT TORRESLOPEZ, 5 G HARVESTING, LLC,
RODRIGO GUTIERREZ-TAPIA, SR.,
CIRILA GARCIA-PINEDA, BLADIMIR
MORENO, and LOS VILLATOROS
HARVESTING, LLC,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO STAY ALL DEADLINES PENDING
SETTLEMENT APPROVAL
For good cause shown in the Joint Motion filed by Plaintiffs and Defendant Hugo Martinez
("Defendant Martinez"), it is hereby ORDERED that all deadlines in this action are STAYED as
-
between Plaintiffs and Defendant Martinez (including but not limited to Defendant Martinez's
deadline to file an answer to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint) pending the Court's ruling on the
parties' Joint Motion for Final Approval of the Settlement Agreement among the Parties.
SO ORDERED. This the __g_£_ of January, 2019.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?