The United States of America v. Hill et al

Filing 24

ORDER denying as moot 15 Motion In Response to Order for Discovery Plan regarding 14 Order for Discovery Planfor the Court's assistance with setting up the Rule 26(f) Conference; denying as moot 16 Motion for the Court's assistance with setting up the Rule 26(f) Conference. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 1/29/2018. Sent to Larry Darnell Hill, Jr., 24346-056 at Lexington - F.M.C. P.O. Box 14500 Lexington, KY 40512 via US Mail. (Briggeman, N.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DNISION
No. 5:17-CV-366-D

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
LARRY DARNELL HILL, JR.,
)
)
Defendant. )

ORDER

On November 16, 2017, Larry Darnell Hill, Jr. ("Hill") responded to the order for a
discovery plan [D.E. 15]. On November 27, 2017, Hill requested assistance with the discovery
plan [D.E. 16]. Essentially, Hill requested assistance in setting up a teleconference with counsel
for plaintiff to discuss the discovery plan.
On December 18, 2017, the United States filed a report of the parties' planning meeting
concerning discovery [D.E. 20]. The report states that Hill ''was initially on the call but refused to
participate in devising a joint discovery plan." Id.
The court DENIES as moot Hill's motions [D.E. 15, 16] concerning the discovery plan.
Obviously, a teleconference was held, but Hill refused to participate.
SO ORDERED. This .ti_ day of January 2018.