Kebort et al v. Stiehl et al

Filing 18

JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff's objections to the M&R [D.E. 16] are OVERRULED, and plaintiff's federal claims [D.E. 10] are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims. Plaintiff may pursue her state law claims in state court. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 6/11/2018. (Briggeman, N.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NANCY H. KEBORT; and B.H.K., a minor, Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT STIEHL, District Court Judge; JAMES COOKE; MARGIT HICKS; GERALD F. KEBORT; ELIZABETH KEEVER; and CLARK REAVES, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE CASE NO. 5:17-CV-418-D Decision by Court. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff's objections to the M&R [D.E. 16] are OVERRULED, and plaintiff's federal claims [D.E. 10] are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims. Plaintiff may pursue her state law claims in state court. This Judgment Filed and Entered on June 11, 2018, and Copies To: Allison Lukanich (Sent to 5070 Tabor Church Rd. Fayetteville, NC 28312 via US Mail) DATE: PETER A. MOORE, JR., CLERK June 11, 2018 (By) /s/ Nicole Briggeman Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?