King v. Berryhill
Filing
21
ORDER granting 20 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 4/15/2018. (Briggeman, N.)
.IN THE UNITED STATES DiSTRICT COURT
FOR THE-EASTERN DISTRICTOFNORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5: 17-cv-437-D
JOHN kiNd·,.
)
Plaintiff,
V.
)
)
)
)
'NANCYBERRYHILL,
Acting Cgliimissi9ner of Social
Se·curity"'
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
CONSENT ORDER
This ac.tiqn being suomi~ted to the Court for entry ofa Consent .Qgl,er agreed to by the
parties ·and {t appearing that Plaintiff. by and through his attomey, lu1.s executed this Consent
Order and Defendant has ·executed this Consent Order, by and through tl1e undersigned Assistant
United States Attorney; and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the :Cotilutlssionei· of
Social Security shOtdd pay the su!11 of $3,600.00 for attorney· fees iri full and final settlement of
all claims for attorney fetes. arising under the Equal Access to Jl.}stice Act ("EAJA"). 28 U.S. C. §
2412(d),.
It is' ther~fore ORDERED that the Conu'nissioner ofSocia:l Securicypay to Ph1iutiff the.
stun .of$3,600,00, sent to Plaintiffs counsel's office address, in full satisfaction of any and all
claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), ·and upon the payment of such sum this case js
dismissed with prejudice.
SO ORDERED. This .1£ day of April 2018.
/1 - D Q._V OJ..
JAMES C. DEVER III
Chief United States District Judge
E:_ONSENTED TQ::
lsi CHARLOTTE W. HALL
Attorney for: Plaintiff
N.C. Bar #·41290
ChariesT, Hall La:w Firm, P.C..
P:.o.~ Box to6i9
Raleigh, J;:-rC 27()05
Teieplione~ (9 I9) 791-1883·
Fax: (919) 791-!'886
charlotte@ch~rleshallfirm. com
.lsi CA,SS,IA W: PARSON
Special Assistant United States Attoniey
Social Security Administration
64Q1 S¢ctirity B9tllevatd
Room 617, Aitmeye:rBuildihg
Baltimore; Maryland 21235
Telephone: (410) 966-0446
Fax: (410) 597-1435
Cassla.parsori@ssa.gov
Maryland Bar ·
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?