Acosta v. Aimet Technologies, LLC

Filing 8

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER - A copy of this Order, together with a copy of Plaintiffs Motion, and all other filings of record not heretofore served, be served upon the Defendant forthwith by a representative of the Wage and H our Division, United States Department of Labor. The court holds in abeyance remaining part of plaintiffs motion, and where it is well-established that a corporation cannot proceed pro se, accords defendant, served September 14, 2017, opportunity now to obtain counsel, prior to setting of any Rule 16 status conference, to address in part a schedule for resolution of issues presented. Where this Order shall expire at 11:00 a.m., on the 25th day of October, 2017, should plaintiff seek to show good cause for extension of same prior to expiration of the order, request for continuance may be filed. It shall show the position of defendant on its face. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 10/11/2017. (Collins, S.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
E ASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
Case No.: 5:17-CV-442

R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary
of Labor, United States
Department of Labor,
Plaintiff
v.
AIMET TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
This Court, having fully considered Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining
Order, hereby finds that the Plaintiff and the public interest will suffer irreparable injury, loss or
damage, if the Defendant is not temporarily enjoined and restrained from:
(1)

transporting, offering for transportation, shipping, delivering,
or selling in commerce, or shipping, delivering or selling with
knowledge that shipment or delivery or sale thereof in
commerce is intended, certain goods in the production of
which employees were employed in violation of Section 6 or
7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 201, et.
seq. as listed below:

(2) and any other goods which Defendant knows were produced
by employees employed in violation of Sections 6 or 7 of the
Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 201, et. seq.
Case 5:17-cv-00442-FL Document 8 Filed 10/11/17 Page 1 of 2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order, together with a copy of
Plaintiff’s Motion, and all other filings of record not heretofore served, be served upon the
Defendant forthwith by a representative of the Wage and Hour Division, United States
Department of Labor. The court holds in abeyance remaining part of plaintiff’s motion, and
where it is well-established that a corporation cannot proceed pro se, accords defendant, served
September 14, 2017, opportunity now to obtain counsel, prior to setting of any Rule 16 status
conference, to address in part a schedule for resolution of issues presented.
Where this Order shall expire at 11:00 a.m., on the 25th day of October, 2017,
should plaintiff seek to show good cause for extension of same prior to expiration of the order,
request for continuance may be filed. It shall show the position of defendant on its face.
SO ORDERED this the 11th day of October, 2017.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:17-cv-00442-FL Document 8 Filed 10/11/17 Page 2 of 2