United States of America v. Leak et al
Filing
26
ORDER denying 25 Motion for Entry of Default without prejudice. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 7/13/2018. (Collins, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5:17-CV-454-FL
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
MELANIE BOYD LEAK, MIA DANIELLE
LEAK, and CEDAR HILL HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC.,
Defendants
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
This matter is before the clerk on the motion for clerk's entry of default against Mia
Danielle Leak [DE-25]. Therein, plaintiff seeks entry of default as to defendant Mia Danielle
Leak, stating that it served this defendant by publication as authorized by Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 4(e)(l) and North Carolina law.
Federal Rule 4(e)(1) permits a plaintiff to serve an individual defendant pursuant to the law
of the "state in which the district court is located." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(l). North Carolina law
permits service of process by publication on a party that cannot through due diligence otherwise
be served. Specifically, Rule 4G 1) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in
pertinent part:
A party that cannot with due diligence be served by personal delivery, registered or
certified mail, or by a designated delivery service authorized pursuant to 26 U.S.C.
§ 7502(f)(2) may be served by publication. Except in actions involving jurisdiction
in rem or quasi in rem as provided in section (k), service of process by publication
shall consist of publishing a notice of service of process by publication once a week
for three successive weeks in a newspaper that is qualified for legal advertising in
accordance with G.S. 1-597 and G.S. 1-598 and circulated in the area where the
party to be served is believed by the serving party to be located, or if there is no
reliable information concerning the location of the party then in a newspaper
circulated in the county where the action is pending. If the party's post-office
address is known or can with reasonable diligence be ascertained, there shall be
mailed to the party at or immediately prior to the first publication a copy of the
notice of service of process by publication. The mailing may be omitted ifthe postoffice address cannot be ascertained with reasonable diligence. Upon completion
of such service there shall be filed with the court an affidavit showing the
publication and mailing in accordance with the requirements of G.S. 1-75.1 O(a)(2),
the circumstances warranting the use of service by publication, and information, if
any, regarding the location of the party served.
N.C. Gen. Stat.§ lA-1, Rule 4Gl). In this case, plaintiff previously showed, through a declaration
of counsel [DE-10-2], its attempts to serve defendant Mia Danielle Leak via personal delivery and
a designated delivery service. Plaintiff also has filed a Certificate of Service [DE-22] , stating that
it published a notice of service of process in The News & Observer, a newspaper qualified for
legal advertising in accordance with N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-597 and 1-589, on April 3, 2018, April
10, 2018, and April 17, 2018. Attached thereto is an affidavit of the publisher, as required byN.C.
Gen. Stat. §1-75.10. There is no affidavit showing, however, that a copy of the notice of the service
of publication was mailed to defendant "at or immediately prior to the first publication" as required
by Rule 4G 1). Instead, plaintiffs counsel states in a declaration that the United States sent a copy
of the summons and complaint via FedEx Overnight to defendant Leak on January 24, 2018.
Because statutes authorizing service of process by publication are strictly construed, see
Sink v. Easter, 284 N.C. 555, 560, 202 S.E.2d 138, 142 (1974), and because plaintiff has failed to
state that it has mailed a copy of the notice of service of publication to the defendant "at or
immediately prior to the first publication," the clerk cannot find that default should be entered.
Accordingly, the motion for entry of default [DE-25] is DENIED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED. This the _j]_ day of July, 2018.
Pe~
Clerk of Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?