McMillian v. White

Filing 19

ORDER denying 18 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/27/2018. (A copy of this Order was sent via US mail to Ann Marie McMillian, 3220 Buffaloe Rd., Raleigh, NC 27604.) (Collins, S.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO. 5:17-CV-498-FL ANN MARIE MCMILLIAN, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER H.L. WHITE, in his individual and official capacity, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion (DE 18) for reconsideration of the court’s October 29, 2018, order. Plaintiff argues that the court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s claims against defendant in his official capacity was in error because plaintiff alleged defendant acted on behalf of the Raleigh Police Department. Such allegation is not sufficient to plead a claim against the defendant in his official capacity. Rather, to plead such a claim, a plaintiff must allege that the individual officer’s actions were taken pursuant to an official policy or custom of the agency. Monell v. Department of Social Services of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 690-92 (1978). Plaintiff has not pleaded facts supporting such a claim in this case. Indeed, similar to allegations addressed in the court’s October 29, 2018, order, plaintiff asserts that defendant acted as a “rogue officer.” (DE 18 at 6). Accordingly, the court correctly dismissed plaintiff’s official capacity claim, with plaintiff’s individual capacity claim remaining. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration thus is DENIED. Per the court’s October 29, 2018, order, service has not yet been accomplished for that claim, and the time for service has been extended to January 12, 2019. SO ORDERED, this the 27th day of November, 2018. _____________________________ LOUISE W. FLANAGAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?