Pirela v. Atkin et al
Filing
19
JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis [D.E. 1] is GRANTED, and plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED as frivolous. Plaintiff's other motions [D.E. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17] are DENIED. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 12/28/2017. (Briggeman, N.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
JOSEPH PIRELA
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
JEFF ATKIN, Clerk of Court, Supreme
)
Court of the United States, Case No. 177-M53 )
Appeal, ILEANA ROS- LEHTINEN, HOUSE )
OF REPRESENTATIVES, The Congress of
)
the United States of America, HOUSE OF
)
PROSTITUTION OF UNKNOWN BAR OF
)
HOMOSEXUALS, (Sex Workers
)
Transvestites-Prostitutes), ALOYMA
)
SANCHEZ, JUDGE THOMAS WILLIAMS, )
MIAMI POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE
)
STATE OF FLORIDA PROCEEDINGS
)
PROSECUTIONS, UNKNOWN BAR OF
)
HOMOSEXUALS, TRANSVESTITES
)
UNKNOWN, SEX WORKERS 33 HEALTH )
CARE BAKER ACT OF JACKSON
)
HOSPITAL, (4) TRANSVESTITE MATTHEW)
JOHN PROSTITUTE HOMOSEXUAL,
)
DAVID COUNTIN, (1) Client, DON SMITH, )
UNKNOWN TRANSVESTITE BAR
)
PROSTITUTE OF BAR OF HOMOSEXUALS )
UNKNOWN, (9), DENIS FONSECA, ANGEL )
MIRANDA, CARLOS ALVAREZ, CITY OF )
MIAMI,
)
)
Defendants.
)
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
CASE NO. 5:17-CV-559-D
Decision by Court.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma
pauperis [D.E. 1] is GRANTED, and plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED as frivolous. Plaintiff's other
motions [D.E. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17] are DENIED.
This Judgment Filed and Entered on December 28, 2017, and Copies To:
Joseph Pirela
(Sent to 2317 Fox Ridge Manor Dr. Raleigh, NC
27610 via US Mail)
DATE:
PETER A. MOORE, JR., CLERK
December 28, 2017
(By) /s/ Nicole Briggeman
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?