Richardson v. Roberts et al

Filing 5

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 4 Memorandum and Recommendations; denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The DIRECTS plaintiff to pay the requisite court costs, including the filing fee on or before April 5, 2018. If plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee by that date, the clerk shall re-designate the action as a miscellaneous case and close the matter without further order from the court. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 3/5/2018. (Collins, S.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO. 5:18-CV-18-FL HILDA RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. VICKIE ROBERTS, DAN FOWELL, KRISTEN BIERLINE, NC DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER, and JOSEPHINE STITH, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter comes before on plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (DE 1). United States Magistrate Judge James E. Gates entered a memorandum and recommendation (“M&R”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), wherein it is recommended that the motion be granted and that plaintiff be required to pay the requisite court costs, including the filing fee. No objections to the M&R were filed. Upon careful review of the M&R and the record in this case, the court ADOPTS the M&R, DENIES plaintiff’s motion for leaved to proceed in forma pauperis, and DIRECTS plaintiff to pay the requisite court costs, including the filing fee on or before April 5, 2018. See Local Civil Rule 3.2. If plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee by that date, the clerk shall re-designate the action as a miscellaneous case and close the matter without further order from the court. SO ORDERED, this the 5th day of March, 2018. LOUISE W. FLANAGAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?