McCoy v. North Carolina Golf and Travel, Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER granting 25 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 25 Motion for Joinder of Additional Party Defendant JAMEL STUBBS. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/29/2018. (Collins, S.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ------------------------------------X JOHN MCCOY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 5:18-cv-00107-FL -againstNORTH CAROLINA GOLF & TRAVEL, INC., SP FUTURES, LLC, and DENNIS WAYNE CYPHERS, Defendants. --------------------------------------X ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT THIS MATTER came to be considered by the Court pursuant to the Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by the Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter. The Court having considered the Motion and being fully advised of the premises, it is, therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. That the Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint is and the same is hereby granted. 2. That the Amended Complaint attached to the afore-referenced Motion shall be deemed filed as of the date of this Order. 3. Defendant(s) already served with the Amended Complaint shall have twenty (20) days from the date of this Order in which to file a responsive pleading. 4. Defendant(s) who have filed a responsive pleading to the original Complaint need not file a further response to the Amended Complaint unless they wish to do so and their response shall stand over to the Amended Complaint. However, if they elect to file a response to the Amended Complaint they shall do so within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order. 5. Defendant(s) not yet served shall be served with the Amended Complaint as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 11/29/18 __________________________________ LOUISE W. FLANAGAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?