Panduit Corp. v. Corning Optical Communications LLC

Filing 98

ORDER granting 93 Motion to Seal 88 PROPOSED SEALED REPLY, 92 PROPOSED SEALED Exhibit. The Clerk is hereby directed to retain under seal 88 Plaintiff Panduit Corp.'s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, Exhibits 1-8 to the same and Exhibit 1 and Exhibit A to Corning's Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/21/2020. (Collins, S.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION

Panduit Corp.,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 5:18-CV-00229-FL

Corning Incorporated,
Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RETAIN UNDER SEAL
This matter having come before the Court on Corning’s Motion (DE 93) to Retain
Under Seal the following sealed documents:
(i) Plaintiff Panduit Corp.’s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion for Leave to File
Second Amended Complaint (DE 88), a redacted version of which has already
been filed publicly;
(ii) Exhibits 1–8 to the same; and
(iii) Exhibit 1 and Exhibit A to Corning’s Motion for Leave to File SurReply.
This Court, having considered the Motion and accompanying memoranda, find that good
cause exists for granting the Motion and it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is ALLOWED.
The Clerk is hereby directed to retain under seal the above-cited documents.

SO ORDERED, this 21st day of December, 2020.
_________________________________
Louise W. Flanagan
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:18-cv-00229-FL Document 98 Filed 12/21/20 Page 1 of 1