Allen et al v. MetLife et al

Filing 48

ORDER granting 26 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response; granting 30 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; granting 40 Motion to Strike 37 "Plaintiffs' Reply to L3/Harris Response Plaintiffs' Opposition to MTD". Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 11/18/2021. (Sellers, N.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DMSION . No. S:21-CV-174-D I KATHY R. ALLEN, and JAY K. ALLEN, Plaintiffs, v. METLIFE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER The court has reviewed defendant L3Harris Technologies, Inc.' s motion to strike [D.E. 40] the documents.that plaintiffs filed entitled, "Plaintiffs' Reply to L3/Hanis Response Plaintiffs' Opposition to MTD" [D.E. 37]. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this court do not permit a party to filed a response to a reply brief, yet that is what Docket Entry 37 is. Thus, the court GRANTS defendants' motion to strike [D.E. 40] and STRIKES Docket Entry 37 from the record. The court also GRANTS plaintiff's motion for an extension of time [D.E. 26] and plaintiff's motion to exceed the page limits [D.E. 30]. SO ORDERED. This~ day ofNovember, 2021. lsc.DEVERm United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?