Terracino et al v. Trimaco, Inc. et al

Filing 93

ORDER granting 91 Joint MOTION for Modified Scheduling Order. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/25/2024. (Collins, S)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5:22-CV-15-FL
ROBERT TERRACINO and
BRADIE TERRACINO, Individuals,
Plaintiffs,

ORDER

v.
TRIMACO, INC.,
Defendant.

This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion of Plaintiffs Robert and Bradie
Terracino (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Trimaco, Inc. (“Defendant”) to Modify the Scheduling
Order. Plaintiffs and Defendant seek to modify the scheduling order. Deadlines set in previous
case management orders not altered herein remain in effect, except as set forth as follows:
Report from Plaintiffs’ retained damages
expert, as required by Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 26(a)(2)

October 11, 2024

Disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 26(a)(2), including reports from
retained experts, to be served by defendant

October 11, 2024

Disclosures and reports by any rebuttal
experts to Plaintiffs’ infringement expert due

October 11, 2024

Disclosures and reports by any rebuttal
experts to Plaintiffs’ damages expert due

October 25, 2024

Disclosures and reports by any rebuttal
experts to Defendant’s infringement expert
due

October 25, 2024

Close of expert discovery

November 26, 2024

WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ and Defendant’s Joint Motion
to Modify the Scheduling Order is hereby GRANTED.
SO ORDERED this the 25th day of September, 2024.
BY:

__________________________________
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
United States District Judge

2