Terracino et al v. Trimaco, Inc. et al

Filing 93

ORDER granting 91 Joint MOTION for Modified Scheduling Order. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/25/2024. (Collins, S)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:22-CV-15-FL ROBERT TERRACINO and BRADIE TERRACINO, Individuals, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. TRIMACO, INC., Defendant. This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion of Plaintiffs Robert and Bradie Terracino (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Trimaco, Inc. (“Defendant”) to Modify the Scheduling Order. Plaintiffs and Defendant seek to modify the scheduling order. Deadlines set in previous case management orders not altered herein remain in effect, except as set forth as follows: Report from Plaintiffs’ retained damages expert, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) October 11, 2024 Disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2), including reports from retained experts, to be served by defendant October 11, 2024 Disclosures and reports by any rebuttal experts to Plaintiffs’ infringement expert due October 11, 2024 Disclosures and reports by any rebuttal experts to Plaintiffs’ damages expert due October 25, 2024 Disclosures and reports by any rebuttal experts to Defendant’s infringement expert due October 25, 2024 Close of expert discovery November 26, 2024 WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ and Defendant’s Joint Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order is hereby GRANTED. SO ORDERED this the 25th day of September, 2024. BY: __________________________________ LOUISE W. FLANAGAN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?