Terracino et al v. Trimaco, Inc. et al
Filing
93
ORDER granting 91 Joint MOTION for Modified Scheduling Order. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 9/25/2024. (Collins, S)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
No. 5:22-CV-15-FL
ROBERT TERRACINO and
BRADIE TERRACINO, Individuals,
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
v.
TRIMACO, INC.,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion of Plaintiffs Robert and Bradie
Terracino (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Trimaco, Inc. (“Defendant”) to Modify the Scheduling
Order. Plaintiffs and Defendant seek to modify the scheduling order. Deadlines set in previous
case management orders not altered herein remain in effect, except as set forth as follows:
Report from Plaintiffs’ retained damages
expert, as required by Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 26(a)(2)
October 11, 2024
Disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 26(a)(2), including reports from
retained experts, to be served by defendant
October 11, 2024
Disclosures and reports by any rebuttal
experts to Plaintiffs’ infringement expert due
October 11, 2024
Disclosures and reports by any rebuttal
experts to Plaintiffs’ damages expert due
October 25, 2024
Disclosures and reports by any rebuttal
experts to Defendant’s infringement expert
due
October 25, 2024
Close of expert discovery
November 26, 2024
WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ and Defendant’s Joint Motion
to Modify the Scheduling Order is hereby GRANTED.
SO ORDERED this the 25th day of September, 2024.
BY:
__________________________________
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?