Proffitt v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety
Filing
30
ORDER adopting 28 Memorandum and Recommendation and denying 14 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Chief U.S. District Judge Richard E. Myers II on 2/5/2024. (McNally, Kimberly)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WESTERN DIVISION
Case No. 5:23-CV-00306-M-RN
CHRISTIAN PROFFITT,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
V.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF PUBLIC SAFETY,
Defendant.
This matter comes before the court on for review of the Order and Recommendation (the
"Recommendation") filed on January 3, 2024, by Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II, in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
DE 28.
In the Recommendation, Judge Numbers
recommends that Defendant's motion to dismiss be denied in light of Plaintiffs subsequent service
of process on Defendant in a manner consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Id. at
1, 7. The Recommendation, which includes instructions and a deadline for objections, was served
on the parties on January 3, 2024. See id. at 7. Neither party objected to the Recommendation.
The court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate judge," 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), but need only "make a de
novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or
recommendations to which objection is made," id. Notwithstanding the lack of objections to the
Recommendation, the court has reviewed the record and made a de novo determination which is
in accord with the Recommendation. The court therefore adopts the Recommendation in full.
The Recommendation [DE 28] is hereby ADOPTED, and Defendant's motion to dismiss
[DE 14] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED this
S* day of February, 2024.
Q; L
fVl-1.--1
~
RICHARD E. MYERS II
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?