United States of America v. Country Layne Day Treatment, LLC et al
Filing
46
ORDER granting 45 Motion to Award Relator Share By The United States to Relator Lewis Christopher Salome - Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 11/16/2014. (Tripp, S.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
No. 7:08-CV-152-D
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
ex rel.
- - - LEWIS CHRISTOPHER
SALOME,
Plaintiff,
v.
COUNTRY LAYNE DAY TREATMENT,
LLC, COUNTRY LAYNE, LLC,
ANDETRA MICHELLE SAMPSON,
and R. LYNN SAMPSON,
ORDER TO AWARD RELATOR SHARE
BY THE UNITED STATES TO RELATOR
LEWIS CHRISTOPHER SALOME
Defendants.
For good cause being shown upon the Motion to Award Relator Share
to Relator Lewis Christopher Salome filed by the United States and
the record before the Court, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Relator is entitled to fifteen percent of the
net proceeds recovered from defendants in this civil qui tam action
and the related forfeiture actions, United States v. Andetra Sampson
and
United
States
v.
Sampson
Personal
Property,
Case
Nos.
7:11-cr-00076-1FL(1) and 7:11-cv-0075-F,
ORDERED that the obligation to make payment to the Relator is
expressly conditioned on the collection by the United States from
the defendants and that the United States shall have no obligation
to make payments to the Relator toward its Relator share except to
1
the extent of its net collection from defendants' assets, and
ORDERED that the United States shall pay fifteen percent of the
net recovery collected from the defendants in this civil action and
the forfeiture actions as a necessary expense and alternate remedy
to relator Lewis Christopher Salome pursuant to 31 U.S.C., Section
3730 (d).
1\fov.e.M.~ ("
SO ORDERED this .1.fL_ day of
'
2014.
J~
DEVER, III
CHIEF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
C.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?