Taylor v. Bettis, et al
Filing
124
JUDGMENT in favor of Brenda Beasley, Cathy Horton Hunt, Chris W Taylor, Dorman Beasley, Linda Sheryl Lucas, Sharon Southwood, William G Harrison against Aegis Corporation, Barrister Legal Services PC, Bettis Dunn & Dunn, CCDN, LLC, Debt Jurisprudence Inc, Emanuel & Dunn, PLLC, Excell Marketing LLC, Legal Debt Cure, LLC, R&G Marketing, R.K. Lock & Associates, The Credit Card Solution, Colleen Tomasino Lock, Ernest Greg Britt, Jr, Jen Devine, Joanne K Partin, Lee W. Bettis, Jr., M David Kramer, Ma rcia M Murphy, Pat Leigh Pittman, Philip M. Manger, Raymond E Dunn, Jr, Richard D Russ, Richard Jude Wasik, Robert Emanuel, Robert K Lock, Jr, Robert Mitchell Lindsey, Rodney Emil Brisco, S John Hagenstein, Stephen A Dunn, Tracy Webster. Signed by Susan Edwards, Deputy for Julie Richards Johnston, Clerk of Court on 9/26/2016. (Edwards, S.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
SHARON SOUTHWOOD, for herself and all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
)
)
)
)
vs.
)
CCDN, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company;
R.K. LOCK & ASSOCIATES, an Illinois general
partnership d/b/a Credit Collections Defense
Network or CCDN; ROBERT K. LOCK, JR.,
ESQ.; COLLEEN LOCK; and PHILIP M.
MANGER, ESQ.,
7:09-CV-81-F
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Defendants.
________________________________________ )
CHRIS TAYLOR; WILLIAM G. HARRISON, SR.;
LINDA SHERYL LUCAS; CAT HY HORT ON HUNT ;
SHARON SOUT HWOOD; and DORMAN and BRENDA
BEASLEY, for themselves and all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
vs.
)
CCDN, LLC; LEGAL DEBT CURE , LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company; BARRIST ER LEGAL
SERVICES, P.C.; DEBT JURISPRUDENCE, INC.;
AEGIS CORPORAT ION; RICHARD JUDE WASIK;
RODNEY EMIL BRISCO; M. DAVID KRAMER;
MARCIA M. MURPHY; and PHILIP M. MANGER,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Defendants.
________________________________________ )
Decision by Court.
7:09-CV-183-F
This ac tion came before the Honorable James C. Fox, Senior United States District Judge, for ruling as
follows:
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED pursuant to the court’s order in 7:09-CV-81-F, dated
10/23/2012 Plaintiffs Motion for Voluntary Dismissal [DE-43] is ALLOWED, and her claims against
Defendants Robert M. Lindsey and The Credit Card Solution are DISMISSED without prejudice;
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [DE-9] is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part; specifically, Plaintiffs
claim for legal malpractice is DISMISSED, her claim under RICO against Colleen Lock is DISMISSED, and
her claim under NC RICO is DISMISSED without prejudice to her to seek leave to file Amended Complaint
attempting to state such a claim; Southwood's Motion for Summary Judgment [DE-17] is DENIED without
prejudic e to renew; Southwood's Motions to Appoint a Receiver [DE-15, 30, 32, 41] are DENIED and
Southwood’s Motion to Expedite [DE-45] is ALLOWED.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED pursuant to the court’s order in 7:09-CV-81-F,
dated 9/30/2013, Defendant Manger's Motion to Dismiss [DE-48] is DENIED. Defendant Manger had 30
days to file his Answer and his response to the Motion to Certify Class. Additionally, the Clerk of Court is
DIRECTED to enter default as to Defendants Robert K. Lock, Colleen Lock, R.K. Lock & Associates, and
CCDN, LLC.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED pursuant to the court’s order in 7:09-CV-81-F dated
3/27/2014, that the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to file an entry of default as to Defendant Philip Manger;
the court in its discretion CONSOLIDATES cases 7:09-CV-81-F and 7:09-CV-183-F. These two ac tions
shall proceed under one consolidated case number, 7:09-CV-81-F (Consolidated Action). Each filing shall
continue to reflect case numbers 7:09-CV-81-F and 7:09-CV-183-F, but shall be filed only in the
consolidated action. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to administratively close the case file ofthe 7:09-CV183-F, and at the appropriate time, that action shall be reopened so that judgment or other proceedings may
be entered therein; that the Amended Motion to Certify Class [DE-34] filed in 7:09-CV-81-F is DENIED
without prejudice to renew in 60 days. Alternatively, should Plaintiff Southwood choose not to file a renewed
motion to certify a class, she should file an appropriate motion with regard to the action within that same time
period; and the Motion to Certify Class [DE-96] filed in 7:09-CV-183-F is DENIED without prejudice to
renew in 60 days. Alternatively, should Plaintiffs choose not to file a renewed motion to certify a class, they
should file an appropriate motion with regard to the action within the same time period.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED pursuant to the court’s order in 7:09-CV-183-F
dated 9/30/2014, that the E&D Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [DE-45] is DENIED; the Arnold Defendants'
Motion to Dismiss [DE-52] is ALLOWED; Defendant Manger's Motion to Dismiss [DE-91] is DENIED;
Plaintiffs' Motion to Appoint Receiver [DE-94] is DENIED; the E&D Defendants' Motion for Judgment on
the Pleadings [DE-98] is ALLOWED in part and all claims except Counts I and III are DISMISSED;
Plaintiffs and the E&D Defendants are DIRECTED to submit briefing, within thirty days of the filing date
of this order, on the impact, if any, of Variety Wholesalers on the Plaintiffs' claims for conversion and
constructive trust; Defendant Manger's Motion to Stay the Motion to Appoint Receiver [DE-104] is
DENIED; the E&D Defendants' Motion to Expedite [DE-110] is DENIED, and the remaining parties are
DIRECTED to show cause, within 30 days, why the instant action should not be consolidated with Civil
Action No. 7:09-CV-81 pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED pursuant to the court’s order in 7:09-CV-183-F
dated 3/27/2014, the E&D Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [DE-98] is ALLOWED as to
the remaining claims against them in this proceeding, and therefore all claims against them are DISMISSED.
Additionally, Plaintiffs' claims against R.K. Lock & Associates; Jen Devine, Robert K. Lock, Jr.; Colleen
Tomasino Lock; S. John Hagenstein; The Credit Card Solution; Robert Mitchell Lindsey; Richard D. Russ;
Ernest Gregg Britt, Jr., R&G Marketing; Exc ell Marketing, LLC, and Tracy Webster are DISMISSED
without prejudice for failure to show service. Finally, the court in its discretion CONSOLIDATES cases
7:09-CV-81-F and 7:09-CV-183-F. These two actions shall proc eed under one consolidated case number,
7:09-CV-81-F (Consolidated Action). Each filing shall continue to reflect case numbers 7:09-CV-81-F and
7:09-CV-183-F, but shall be filed only in the consolidated action. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to
administratively close the case file of the instant action. At the appropriate time, the instant action shall be
reopened so that judgment or other proceedings may be entered therein.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED pursuant to the court’s order dated 4/7/2016, The
Memorandum and Recommendation [DE 69] is ADOPTED. Plaintiffs' objection [DE 70] is OVERRULED.
Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment [DE 60] is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART. Lucas is
entitled to a default judgment against CCDN and Manger on the CROA claim; however, Lucas is not
entitled to a damages award. The Beasleys are entitled to a default judgment against CCDN and Manger
on the CROA claim for compensatory damages of $5,000, punitive damages of $15,000 and the costs of
litigation, including reasonable attorney's fees, rec overable from CCDN or Manger. The Clerk of Court is
DIRECTED to reopen the Taylor Action, No. 7:09-CV-183-F.
FINALLY, HAVING REVIEWED THE AMENDED ELECTION OF REMEDIES, AND PURSUANT
TO THE COURT’S APRIL 7, 2016 ORDER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and
DECREED as follows:
(1)
Judgment shall enter in favor of Sharon Southwood and against Manger, CCD , and R.K. Lock &
Associates for compensatory damages of $6,600, punitive damages of $19,800, plus litigation costs, includ
ing reasonable attorney's fees, recoverable jointly and severally from CCDN, R.K. Lock & Associates, the
Locks and Manger.
(2)
Judgment shall enter in favor of Chris Taylor and against CCDN and Manger for compensatory
damages of $4,500, punitive damages of $13,500, plus the costs of litigation, including reasonable attorney's
fees, recoverable from CCD or Manger.
(3)
Judgment shall enter in favor of William G. Harrison and against Manger, Aegis, and CCDN for
compensatory damages of $4,200, punitive damages of $12,600, the costs of litigation, including reasonable
attorney's fees, recoverable either jointly and severally from Aegis and CCDN or from Manger.
(4)
Judgment shall enter in favor of Linda Sheryl Lucas and against CCDN and Manger. Lucas shall not
recover a damages award.
(5)
Judgment shall enter in favor of Cathy Horton Hunt and against CCDN and Manger for
compensatory damages of $2,500, punitive damages of $7,500 and litigations costs, including reasonable
attorney's fees, recoverable from CCDN or Manger.
(6)
Judgment shall enter in favor of Dorman and Brenda Beasley against CCDN and Manger for
compensatory damages of $5 ,000, punitive damages of $15,000 and the costs of litigation, including
reasonable attorney's fees, recoverable from CCDN or Manger.
(7)
Default judgment is denied as to the following defendants in the Taylor action:
a. Marcia M. Murphy
b. M. David Kramer
c. Debt Jurisprudence, Inc.
d. Rodney Emil Brisco
e. Legal Debt Cure, LLC
f. Barrister Legal Services, P.C.
g. Richard Jude Wasik
(8)
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in accordance with this Order.
(9)
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to reopen Case No. 7:09-CV-183-F for entry of this
Order and judgment.
(10)
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close Case Nos. 7:09-CV-81-F and 7:09-CV-183-F.
This Judgment Filed and Entered on September 26, 2016, and Copies To:
Christopher Livingston (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Lee W. Bettis, Jr. (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
DATE
September 26, 2016
JULIE RICHARDS JOHNSTON, CLERK
/s/ Susan K. Edwards
(By) Susan K. Edwards, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?