Native Angels Homecare Agency, Inc. v. Sebelius
ORDER: The court overrules defendant's objection [D.E. 45] and adopts the Memorandum and Recommendations (as amended) [D.E. 41, 47]. Native Angels is awarded $61,326.25 in attorney's fees, $8,933.79 in attorney's fees based on paralegal services, and $9,981.41 in costs. Thus, the total award is $80,241.45. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 11/29/2011. (Sawyer, D.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
NATIVE ANGELS HOME CARE
On May 25,2011, Native Angels Homecare Agency, Inc., (''Native Angels") filed a motion
for an award of attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28
U.S.C. § 2412(d) [D.E. 34]. On August 29,2011, this court referred the motion to Magistrate Judge
Webb for a memorandum and recommendation [D.E. 40]. On September 22, 2011, Magistrate Judge
Webb entered his memorandum and recommendation ("M&R") [D.E. 41] and recommended that the
court grant Native Angels' motion for attorney's fees and award Native Angels $61,326.25 in
attorney's fees and $9,981.41 in costs. Magistrate Judge Webb also directed the parties to submit
evidence ofthe prevailing hourly rate for paralegal services so that he could recommend an additional
award for 80.9 hours of paralegal services.
The parties complied with Magistrate Judge Webb's order and submitted additional evidence
on the prevailing hourly rate for paralegal services [D.E. 42, D.E. 43, D.E. 44]. On October 26, 2011,
Magistrate Judge Webb amended the M&R to recommend an additional award in the amount of
$8,933.79 for the 80.9 hours of paralegal services performed [D.E. 47].
On October 6, 2011, defendant filed an objection "limited to a single sentence" in the
September 21,2011 M&R relating to defendant's requestto offset any attorney fee award against debts
Native Angels may have with defendant [D.E.45]. Defendant's objection focuses on the following
sentence in the M&R: ''The Wldersigned moreover rejects the Secretary's contention that any award
ofattorney fees should be withheld to offset Native Angels' outstanding federal debt." M&R 13. The
Secretary objects to this sentence to the extent that it seeks to enjoin offset by the United States. See
Def.'s Obj. to M&R 7.
"The Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to make a de novo determination ofthose
portions ofthe [magistrate judge's] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which
objection is made." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005)
(alteration in original) (emphasis removed) (quotation omitted). Absent a timely objection, "a district
court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfY itself that there is no clear error
on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Id. (quotation omitted).
The court has reviewed the M&R and the record. As for those portions ofthe M&R to which
defendant did not object, the court is satisfied that there is no clear error on the face ofthe record and
the court adopts the M&R. As for the objection, the court has reviewed the objection and the M&R
In defendant's response to Native Angels's motion for attorney's fees and costs, defendant
intimated that the court should offset any EAJA award against any debt owed by Native Angels to the
federal government. See Def.'s Resp. 11-12 [D.E. 37]. However, defendant now appears to concede
that this court need not determine any offset. See Def.' s Obj. to M&R [D.E. 45]. After reviewing the
record and governing law, the court concludes that any purported offset is not germane to this court's
decision to award attorneys' fees and costs in this case to Native Angels Wlder the EAJA.
Accordingly, the court overrules defendant's objection [D.E. 45] and adopts the M&R (as
amended) [D.E. 41, 47]. In accordance with the M&R (as amended), Native Angels is awarded
$61,326.25 in attorney's fees, $8,933.79 in attorney's fees based on paralegal services, and $9,981.41
in costs. Thus, the total award is $80,241.45
SO ORDERED. This..ai day ofNovember 2011.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?