Titan America LLC, et al v. Darrell, et al

Filing 45

ORDER granting 30 Motion for Protective Order; denying 39 Motion to Compel; and, denying 41 Corrected Motion for Discovery - Good cause having been shown for entry of protective order, the court adopts as its own the proposed protective orde r filed as Exhibit A to plaintiffs' motion, and ncorporates same by reference herein as if completely set forth. Where protections requested by plaintiff now have been accorded to certain information sought by defendants in discovery, plaintiff is directed to supplement its responses in discovery within fourteen (14) days hereof. Should issues remain, defendants may file the appropriate motion in discovery, renewing in whole or in part any perceived failure properly to respond. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 01/05/2012. (Baker, C.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
NO. 7:11-CV-52-FL

TITAN AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware Limited
Liability Company, and CAROLINAS
CEMENT COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware
Limited Liability Company,
Plaintiffs,
v.
KAYNE O. DARRELL and DAVID L. HILL,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for protective order (DE # 30), filed
December 2, 2011, to which defendants responded in opposition. Good cause having been shown
for entry of protective order, the court adopts as its own the proposed protective order filed as
Exhibit A to plaintiffs’ motion, and incorporates same by reference herein as if completely set forth.
In light of the court’s ruling on this motion, where it appears that entry of a protective order
will affect the various discovery disputes noted in defendants’ motion to compel, lodged at docket
entry 39, and corrected motion for discovery, lodged at docket entry 41, the court denies said
motions without prejudice to their renewal.
Where protections requested by plaintiff now have been accorded to certain information
sought by defendants in discovery, plaintiff is directed to supplement its responses in discovery
within fourteen (14) days hereof. Should issues remain, defendants may file the appropriate motion
in discovery, renewing in whole or in part any perceived failure properly to respond.

SO ORDERED, this the 5th day of January, 2012.

_____________________________
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN
United States District Judge

2